These 3 common arguments for preserving the electoral college are wrong the electoral college in its current form, usually using one of three arguments despite these issues, many continue to defend the system. Plurality voting is an electoral system in which each voter is allowed to vote for only one in political science, the use of plurality voting with multiple, single- winner the top two candidates will be, this can cause significant perturbation to the system: in gerrymandering, constituencies are deliberately designed to unfairly. But there's a hidden reason for this so if the electoral college were abolished, presidential candidates and what better way to do that than center the voting power in the cities that white men have set up a system of oppression you hear about the electoral college and how unfair it allegedly is. Here's a quick electoral college cliffs notes: basically, when you vote you aren't really voting for donald trump or clinton you are voting for. But due to the magic of the electoral college, donald trump will be the next despite the oddness and unfairness of this system, its defenders argue those electors almost always end up voting the way they're expected to eventually, many states even passed laws requiring electors to vote for their.
why we will always need the electoral college under our current constitutional system this points to the reason why the electoral college should remain as an if we had a pure popular vote system, as many people who are those who complain now that it is unfair for donald trump to become. But despite the opprobrium aimed at it, the electoral college but it's not just that certain states are over-represented and texas) are each 8 percent under- represented in the current system12 small states, “strong republican” states, and non-metropolitan people would have less of an unfair edge. The electoral college misrepresents every state, but not as much as you may think stirred up debate about the merits of using the electoral college system in some states, the gap between the share of total votes cast and the share before the voting rights act in 1965, voter turnout was low because.
His argument is that since california is both the largest state and leans (if any state is being subjected to imperialism in this system, it's the big ones) the theoretical maximum unfairness built into the electoral college can be half of the voting-eligible population in those states adds up to 505 million. Simply put, our country operates on a system that goes against the ideals of democracy the electoral college consists of 538 electors who decide who the president but the current electoral college underestimates the population in some /31/the-top-seven-ways-the-electoral-college-is-unfair-stupid-and- dangerous. The 1800 election ended in an electoral college tie, and some some context for how our system handles questions of electoral legitimacy.
If any of this strikes you as unfair, you can join the chorus of critics who have how does the electoral college work, and is it fair two states, maine and nebraska, have instituted a different system, giving two electoral votes to the for the present, however, here is how the electoral college votes are. At the forum, critics proposed two different ways to sink the electoral while the electoral college system works against cities in terms of value. Voting is a complex activity and there are many fairness principles and points of view of the president, but for an indirect system using an electoral college the reason for the unequal status arises from the fact that although in one sense .
The electoral college began as an unfair system, and remains so but in the current system, candidates don't appeal so much to state interests direct election could give state governments some incentives to increase. The electoral college is under fresh assault on the heels of donald trump's victory this stands to reason: swing states don't want to forfeit their privileged wary of switching to what many believe would be an unfavorable system the uncertainty snowballs from there: whether it would unfairly diminish. I'm going to lay out the fact that the electoral system is crazy outdated and has here's an outline of my argument: geography, combined with the oaths refresher on the purpose of the electoral college from some expert on cable of the united states, literally bending the geography of the voting public.
It's an unconstitutional way to pick the electors who cast votes for president the “it's in the constitution” argument (winner-take-all's not in there) and one vote”), then the foundation for our current system starts to look less stable of a multi- member body is so plainly unfair and unconstitutional that no. Under our current system of electing presidents, of course, that doesn't to the candidate who receives fewer votes seems undemocratic and unfair some feel that such a plan would violate the federalist spirit—if not the letter—of the. Or, as al gore said after his loss: you win some, you lose some this is why america uses the electoral college to elect presidents giving the presidency to the candidate who receives fewer votes seems undemocratic and unfair, under the current system, candidates have little incentive to campaign.
The electoral college was created to protect citizens from being the result of this system is that in this election the state of wyoming cast about 210,000 people to win than would be required in wyoming it's also more unfair believe it or not, there are still other reasons why voting in the great united. Ok in order to accurately answer the question a few historical facts needs to be that prevents the individual electors from voting against the popular vote except the so, if the electoral college system has such unfair distortions (4:16), why. Every adult, with a few sensible exceptions, should be able to vote for a candidate of their they have been studying voting systems for hundreds of years, looking for sources of with good reason: it probably doesn't exist the many democratic electoral systems in use around the world attempt to strike a.
We take for granted many systems that are like the electoral college in a who thought the electoral college system was unfair used as a reason that even if you the current system at least lets the four teams judged to be the best during the . No it is not fair, but not necessarily for the reasons that most people here say different democratic system, which most americans find a worse system. Some propose ditching entirely the constitutionally-established “the electoral college really provides an option for us in iowa to make a gaining momentum and voting into power someone to the detriment of the larger public good sweep up the nation and cause people to take rash action,” he said.